INVESTMENT STRATEGIES GEOGRAPHICAL ALLOCATION
“
We do not
get involved in
geographical
allocation in equity
markets because we
have no evidence
we are any good
at it, and we have
scant evidence that
virtually anybody else
is any good at it
”
Dan Kemp, investment director,
Saltus
Correlation table – 1 year to 4 Dec ’09
FTSE 100 FTSE World
Europe
MSCI EM S&P 500 Topix
FTSE 100 Benchmark 0.98 0.83 0.85 0.89
FTSE World Europe 0.98 Benchmark 0.88 0.92 0.89
MSCI EM 0.83 0.88 Benchmark 0.83 0.7
S&P 500 0.85 0.92 0.83 Benchmark 0.82
Topix 0.89 0.89 0.7 0.82 Benchmark
Source: Morningstar
Correlation table – 3 years to 4 Dec ’09
FTSE 100 FTSE World
Europe
MSCI EM S&P 500 Topix
FTSE 100 Benchmark 0.94 0.87 0.83 0.7
FTSE World Europe 0.87 Benchmark 0.89 0.89 0.78
MSCI EM 0.83 0.89 Benchmark 0.73 0.65
S&P 500 0.7 0.78 0.65 Benchmark 0.73
Topix
Source: Morningstar
0.7 0.78 0.65 0.73 Benchmark
Correlation table – 10 years to 4 Dec ’09
FTSE 100 FTSE World
Europe
MSCI EM S&P 500 Topix
FTSE 100 Benchmark 0.94 0.78 0.84 0.53
FTSE World Europe 0.94 Benchmark 0.82 0.86 0.55
MSCI EM 0.78 0.82 Benchmark 0.75 0.59
S&P 500 0.84 0.86 0.75 Benchmark 0.58
Topix
Source: Morningstar
0.53 0.55 0.59 0.58 Benchmark
“In many funds, managers
are allowed to have,
say, 20% outside of their
main area, and I have seen
UK special situations funds
that have direct exposure to
Chinese stocks.”
He adds: “I think it is
wrong to put managers into
boxes because the reality is
while most of them have
currently got dollar earners,
as that is probably the
right place to be, if they
thought it was appropriate
they would switch to
domestic earners. It can be
too simplistic if you just
look at the headline, you
can miss what is going on
underneath the surface.”
Sure, geographical segregation
serves to give investors
a practical handle on
the nature of their equity
exposure, risk and even
clues to its liquidity, but
would it not be more useful
to look first on a thematic
basis, or through sector
allocation?
l Thematic investing
Peter Hicks, head of UK
retail sales at Fidelity
International, points out
that while multi-managers,
discretionaries and wealth
advisers do not traditionally
invest in global growth
funds per se, they will
still invest in far-reaching
global funds through thematic
products.
He says: “More people
invest in global funds than
you might think, but the
first decision is a thematic
one, such as focus on consumer
areas, real assets or
healthcare.”
Dan Kemp, investment
director at Saltus, also follows
a thematic approach
to an extent by investing
solely through asset
class. If he wants generic
equity exposure, he will
invest roughly in line with
a global benchmark, such
as the MSCI World, and
within that hedge currencies
or have higher or
lower beta exposure where
appropriate.
He says: “We do not get
involved in geographical
allocation in equity markets
because we have no
evidence we are any good
at it, and we have scant
evidence that virtually anybody
else is any good at
it. Our approach is to ask
which assets at the moment
have the best return/risk
profile, that is, what do
we think offers the best
value for the level of risk,
whether that is potential
downside or volatility?”
l Globalised markets
Kemp’s own research shows
that by comparing the
performance of the MSCI
Emerging Markets index
since it was formed in 1995
with the MSCI World, there
is an almost perfect correlation
of returns; except
there is much higher beta
in emerging markets (see
graph on page 22).
He adds: “If you thought
equities were going up over
the past 15 years, you would
buy emerging markets
because they go up faster.
If you thought the market
was to go down, then you
do not hold emerging markets
because they go down
faster and the developed
markets go down slower
– you can accomplish that
without any geographical
allocation, just a balance of
the S&P 500 and cash.”
Of course, as Kemp himself
acknowledges, there
will be times when geographical
allocation does
take on more importance
and can make a big impact
on returns. For example,
fund managers would have
benefited greatly from
avoiding Japan throughout
the 1990s.
However, asset allocators
point out that as equity
markets have become more
globalised, the difference
in behaviour of the major
stock market indices has
lessened. A UK-based
investor might be wise to
assume that if the S&P 500
rises in the afternoon, there
is a very strong chance
that Asian indices will rise
overnight and that the FTSE
100 will rise tomorrow,
providing of course there
has been no great global
shocks to financial markets
18 PORTFOLIO ADVISER [www.portfolio-adviser.com] JANUARY 2010